Website

What marriage equality means to me (a personal reflection)

Marriage equality is now law in Australia. The first legal same-sex marriages will take place on 9 January 2018, after a drawn-out and often ugly debate during which the conservative right expended every arrow in their quiver in a last-ditch attempt to resist change. Maybe, as Prime Minister Turnbull believes, it had to go this way: that change is only possible when it's inevitable and can not longer be resisted. I don't believe that. Change is both desirable and necessary, and each moment of change resisted is a moment of unnecessary injustice. 

On the website side of things, blogging is going to to slow down as we head towards Christmas, and I get ready for exams and winter holidays. So forgive the personal nature of this week's entry, but I'm going to tell you all a story about what marriage equality means to me.

Once upon a time . . . 

I came to politics late. I was middle-class kid with scientists for parents who never talked about politics and never really showed an interest in social policy. They were prototypical Uninvolved. History was my gateway drug. The past was filled with heroic figures and world-shaking events in faraway places. To this day, "Lawrence of Arabia" remains my favourite movie: the capacity of an individual, no matter how flawed, to change the world was revelatory to a kid in the Australian suburbs. It probably helped that Lawrence was increasingly coming to be seen a queer figure. I obsessed over the Second World War (aided in part by my grandparents memories ), intensively studying the epic that shaped the modern world. I came out the other side something of an enthusiast for the Soviet aesthetic, a teenage 'tankie'.

Thanks to a scholarship, I was educated a private boys school in Melbourne. The atmosphere was blatantly homophobic, if not outright reactionary. Hard as it may be to understand only twenty years later, but it was a very different time: the internet and social media barely existed; kids didn't have phones and bullying and inter-student violence was commonplace; teachers could and did employ corporal punishment, even if it was slowly falling out of use. Although kids I went to school with came out later in life, I only knew of only one 'bisexual' guy at the time. He cut himself with glass pieces that lay around the school ground. That was a real thing, that neither I nor anyone around me was equipped to acknowledge, much less deal with. This was an environment in which putting gay people in concentration camps was considered a 'humane' policy: cruelty against those who were different was a way of life. 

This attitude didn't necessarily take its cues from official policy. The school was religious, but overall rather progressive by those standards. Nor was it the result of cultural or racial values: the student body was extremely multicultural, as most in Australia are. No, this was a homophobia bred entirely through adolescent male macho culture that punished deviance and perceived weakness. What a shock then to realise that adult society was no different: that high politics, law and policy embodied these same reactionary values. This awareness dawned for me in 2000, when the conservative Australian government petulantly sought to cut gay couples off from IVF and medically-assissted conception. These adult debates were mirrored in the classroom: one of the jocks threw a chair at me for daring to argue the other side.  

Pop culture also played an important role. Joss Whedon and "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" will always remain an important influence on progressives of a certain age, and "New Moon Rising", the fourth-season episode in which one of the main characters came out as gay, floored me. The narrative of coming out was unlike anything I had experienced before: it was a personalised heroic epic, the individual taking charge of their own fate and making a conscious break with the established rules and customs of society. It also personalised the broader political struggle in a way reading the news never did: I didn't know any out people, but thanks to fictionalised characters I felt like I did. I wrote an extremely personal essay at the time, trying to explain how much influence the 'coming out' narrative was having on my political worldview, the only upshot of which is that my English teacher probably thought I was gay. 

So I came to politics late, but I came to it through gay rights. Inequalities based on sexual preference made the abstract aesthetics of progress personal in a way that a cis-, white middle class kid would otherwise not have experienced. To realise that everyone is the hero of their own story, and that we all have barriers and oppression to overcome, is a powerful thing. It's served as a lodestar for me these last twenty years (I almost quit the Labor Party in 2004 over their disgraceful cowardice on the issue) and reaching this point therefore feels like a moment of both culmination and release.  I can't claim to have played any role - better men and women than I have made it their life work, and it's they who now deserve all the credit. But I think a lot of us are going to to feel a bit unmoored, directionless and adrift now that it's done. 

Where, then, do we go next? Obviously, trans rights are going to be hard fought the next few years, but there too, social change feels inevitable. I think the path I've taken, and the advice I'd give to others, is this: whatever brings you to progressivism, stay a while and listen. Ask your comrades what brought them there and offer your support. Listen and learn, build ties between your struggle and theirs and come to see the connections and structures that unite them. It may take a while, but eventually I like to think we can generalise our identities from the initial struggles that motivate us: to recognise that it was not this injustice that made us angry, but this injustice. And one by one, working together, they will be overcome. 

Welcome!

Greetings, and welcome to the website for “Politics for the New Dark Age: Staying Positive Amidst Disorder”, a new book from Hybrid Publishers in Melbourne, available in Australian bookstore now and online soon. I’m the author, Anthony Skews, and I’ll be using this site to communicate with readers, answer your questions, respond to reviews, offer new insights and further elaborations, as well as offer my thoughts and commentary on current events and popular culture.

Who am I? I’m a ten-year veteran of the Australian foreign service, a Labor Party member and proud trade unionist. Needless to say, the views expressed in my book and on this website are my own and do not reflect the views or positions of the Commonwealth Government or its agencies. Currently, I’m on sabbatical in Europe, writing a dissertation which will eventually form the basis of a more technical follow-up to this current book. Written over the course of 2015 & 2016, Politics distills my observations of contemporary Australian political discourse. It responds to a clear gap I saw on the political left around the world: the failure to tie our activist instincts with the latest social and economic research into a coherent and, more importantly, persuasive left-wing philosophy for our chaotic times.

The end of the Cold War has long been blamed for the decline in the left’s ideological potency, but from the perspective of 2017, we have also been notably slow in adapting to the mood of the times. Hillary Clinton’s defeat in the 2016 US presidential election, which took place after the book’s text was finalised, is emblematic of the strategic failure of a certain model of technocratic centrism that has dominated progressive politics for too long. In 2017, we can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that more equality makes society better off. But we need to sell that vision to a voting public that doesn’t care about economic models and painstaking research.

Although written largely before the Age of Trump, Politics is a book suited for the times we live in. It anticipates the need for transformative leaders like Bernie Sanders in the US and Jeremy Corbyn in the UK. It combines a realist view of human nature with a strongly idealist political programme. Drawing on evolutionary political science and sociology, policy-making is re-conceived not as the search for rational ‘truth’ or maximal utility, but rather an arena of perpetual conflict in which rational optimisation is impossible and political power, or influence over outcomes, is what matters. Within that framework it suggests that a venerable political philosophy, the socialist strand of liberalism, remains best suited for progressives to advocate for today.